Thursday, February 19, 2009

Error Exception C0000005 Of Tally

More bookmarks from Valkyrie

* Leo out there that Valkyrie (this is the local title) is an "average film." What is the average?


* This could only be asserted if the films used for such are the decade average of 50 '.

* Confronting different war, Hollywood movies always opted for another position . First from any prospect "historic" and "ideological." But above all these conflicts used as starting points, as potential diegesis to deploy a range of symbolic possibilities and to become universal and timeless values \u200b\u200bthat contain these possibilities. The heroism, understood as a function-be it transcendental or moral, is one of them. Valkyrie is.

* Actually, rather than making these values \u200b\u200buniversal and timeless, the film reminds us of the universality and timelessness of them.

* Valkyrie no way is a masterpiece. The average modern film can be confusing. Therefore we must be clear and insistent: it is a movie of the decade average of 50 '.

* Leo also: "... more heroism humanity, in a thriller film that puts the deep, unfathomable historical drama." This is that, of course, as an objection to Singer's film. If the author of the phrase would have understood the film would have used those words to write a sentence like, but surely appreciative.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Rehydratereplenishsaltelectrolytes

Notes for a future review of Valkyrie


· Valkyrie shows the way that a director like Bryan Singer should continue (as Christopher Nolan and David Fincher): one that avoids both the vices of entertainment as well as the temptation to be recognized as auteur.

· Valkyrie is, say, a studio film. In that it follows a classical spirit (in the Hollywood sense of the term) of narrative economy and interpretive.

• In Valkyrie all characters are defined by their actions. No psychologism. A couple of words, a couple of gestures, and how to act on the facts carefully defined each of them. And that constitutes, of course, the depth of the film.

· The events described in Valkyrie are, obviously, and in relation to what is called "historical truth", a little distorted. For example omits that the conspiracy against Jesuit priests were involved Hitler and members of the Lutheran church. But we know that when transformed into film, of course if this film is able to approach the concept of cinema-the "historical truth" can not be an evaluation parameter (except of course, nonsense is reached extreme as the de-forgiveness "The Da Vinci Code, where the idiocy and ignorance reaches cosmic levels, there is different, and, of course, that is outside the cinema, and any activity that is honorable.)

· Valkyrie is central heroic role.

• The constant appearance of the heroic element, its configurations and reconfiguration is a cornerstone of cinema.

• The Valkyrie hero Claus von Stauffenberg, a Catholic military in search of redemption. And that redemption is primarily including, but not only.

• The hero is the one who decides. Says very clearly: "I came to make decisions. And to help others to take. "

• A picture of the best shows Von Stauffenberg Valkyrie thoughtfully, while a mirror gives us back the image with a crucifix on his head. That we know what decisions respond HA. Before the movement of a pendant as a result of bombing, and background music of Wagner and We had anticipated the emergence of verticality.

· Wagner. Hitler tells von Stauffenberg in a meeting: "Whoever does not understand Wagner, National Socialism never understand." Had previously explained what are the Valkyries. The genealogy of delusions pseudomíticos a certain German thought is underlined in Valkyrie. Claus Von Stauffenberg's face from his faith and Christian heroism.

· In this confrontation, which through the operation of film aesthetics becomes a symbol of eternal conflict-born this good movie. Interesting and successful

friend Fabian comment on his blog: http://anotandocine.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

How To Use Cheats Cydia On Gbc Ad



Eleven years ago, ie on 17 February 1998, also Tuesday, died in Wilflingen, Ernst Jünger. He was 103 years.

What is the point to remember this date? It's just an excuse to remember. An excuse no coincidence, because today I was about to reread one of his books, and read the prologue noticed the coincidence of dates. As I said, no chance.
So that, an excuse to remind Jünger, to enhance the reading of his works. Back to your thoughts, experiences, imagination.
course it is not difficult to return to an author as well. It is, rather, inevitable. And necessary.
Jünger is the look of the twentieth century. Is the sharp and steady voice. Sometimes painful, always lucid, particularly beautiful in its deployment.

is an author who adheres. One carries it and have it there, near the ear. Always.
The wind wanted to blow often, very often, in the pages of this wonderful
ambushed.